Tuesday 29 May 2012

Satellite

Have wonder what happen to the satellites in the space? Anybody? The recent trials of an out-of-control communications satellite and a defunct, leaky Soviet-era spacecraft toting its own nuclear reactor call up the question: What exactly happens when satellites die in space?
There are actually a few possibilities, some good, and others not so much.


Bury the dead
If mission controllers spot a glitch in time, they can force a still-functioning satellite to fire its engines and reach a so-called? graveyard orbit? a few hundred miles above its initial flight path in order to safeguard its neighboring spacecraft against possible damage. That's what engineers are trying to do for the telecommunications satellite Astra 5A, which inexplicably failed on Jan. 15 after 12 years of operation. The satellite has since been a drift in space, moving out of its geostationary position about 22,300 miles (35,888 km) above Earth and is moving eastward along its orbital arc.
Astra 5A's owners, SES of Luxemburg, are pessimistic they'll be able regain communications with the satellite and order it out to a safe orbit, and have since warned the owners of other nearby satellites that they may need to take measures to avoid an in-space collision.
Satellites at the end of their lifetime have periodically been sent into graveyard orbits.
In 2006, Russia's Express-AM11 communications satellite was moved to an orbital grave after being hit by space debris.
Shoot it down
In some extreme cases, ailing satellites can be blasted out space entirely.
Last year, the U.S. military launched a missile from the Pacific Ocean that obliterated the spy satellite USA 193. The missile destroyed the satellite, which was plunging to Earth with a full tank of toxic hydrazine fuel, on Feb. 20, 2008.
Other satellite shootdowns have not been so tidy. When China blasted an aging weather satellite to bits in a 2007 anti-satellite test, the explosion generated a cloud of orbital debris and sparked widespread criticism from other nations.
Watch and see
Analysts can also leave a problematic satellite to its own devices. That appears to be the case with the Soviet-era satellite Cosmos 1818. Launched by the former Soviet Union in 1987, Cosmos 1818 was the first of two satellites to test the use of advanced nuclear power plants in space.
But this month, NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office issued a quarterly update reporting that Cosmos 1818 spewed a cloud of debris on July 4, 2008 that may have been the result of leaking reactor coolant from a debris strike or fragmentation.
According to a Thursday report by the Associated Press, Russia?s Space Forces chief Gen. Alexander Yakushin confirmed the fragmentation of Cosmos 1818, but stressed it does not pose any risk of damaging the International Space Station or raining radiation-contaminated debris on Earth because of its intentionally high orbit. The satellite is breaking up in an orbit 500 miles (800-km) above Earth - well above the 220-mile (354-km) plane of the space station - and its status is being monitored daily, the Associated Press reported.
While Cosmos 1818 appears to be under control, the same can't be said for Cosmos 954, a Radar Ocean Reconnaissance Satellite (RORSAT) that spiraled out of control in 1978. The satellite re-entered the Earth?s atmosphere and spread radioactive debris across parts of Canada.
Fix it or bring it back
Ailing satellites used to have a lifeline in NASA?s space shuttles, which have payload bays large enough to fit small spacecraft inside to be returned to Earth or fixed in space.
The 18-year-old Hubble Space Telescope, for example, is one of the crowning achievements of satellite resurrections. NASA astronauts have visited the space-based observatory no less than four times, first to correct its blurry vision, then to add new cameras and instruments that extended its mission.
NASA plans to launch the fifth and final servicing mission to Hubble on May 12.
With NASA's space shuttle fleet slated to retire in 2010, sick satellites may soon be visited by robotic surgeons. In 2007, the Pentagon successfully tested flew a pair of spacecraft that demonstrated the ability to refuel and service satellites robotically. The $300 million Orbital Express mission used a target satellite and a robotic-arm wielding service vehicle to demonstrate autonomous rendezvous and servicing tasks.
The fiery plunge
One of the more common ends for defunct spacecraft and garbage is death by cremation, in which old spacecraft and debris are intentionally burned up in the Earth?s atmosphere.
Russia's unmanned Progress cargo ships routinely end their spacefaring lives as fireballs after delivering cargo shipments to the International Space Station. The Russian Space Station Mir was also discarded in a similar funeral pyre in 2001.
Jules Verne, Europe?s first-ever Automated Transfer Vehicle, gave scientists a spectacular light show when it ended its debut flight last fall in a fiery blaze over the Pacific Ocean. Two chase planes were dispatched to record the death of the spacecraft, which was as large as a London double-decker bus.
Some pieces of debris don?t burn up in controlled cremations.
Last November, a tank of toxic ammonia the size of a refrigerator burned up over the Southern Pacific Ocean more than a year after a spacesuit-clad astronaut chucked it from the International Space Station. NASA did not know where the tank would ultimately re-enter and the U.S. Space Surveillance Network tracked the object to make sure its toxic remains did not endanger people on Earth.
Perhaps the most memorable piece of U.S. space junk was the 77-ton Skylab space station, which re-entered the Earth's atmosphere in July 1979, spreading debris across areas of the Southeastern Indian Ocean and parts of Western Australia.

I think that the government of every country in the world should play the role of doing something to this satellite.If we do not make an effort to this problem, the space will be full of rubbish which is the satellite that all of the people use.

Disadvantages of technology

In the year of 2012, there are many types of technology that have advanced which beyond human capability. Examples of this technologies are smartphones, tablet, the super fast internet access which is Unifi and television that can be used as a computer. As you can see on the left are some examples of smartphone.

Do you have a moment that you think the disadvantages of technology? It is true that the technology nowadays are advanced which brings benefit to us but do remember that everything that have goods also have bad. Here are the disadvantages of technology :-
 -Technology makes life more complex. 
- Sweatshops and harsher forms of slavery are more likely to be found in technologically advanced societies, relative to primitive societies. 
- The increasing oppression of technologically advanced societies over those which are not. 
- More people are starving (in total numbers and per-capita), in this most technologically advanced age, than at any other point in history or primitive pre-history. 
- The increase in transportation technology has brought stressful traffic congestion in some areas. 
- Technicism 
- New forms of danger existing as a consequence of innovative forms of technology, new types of nuclear reactors, unforeseen genetic mutations as the result of genetic engineering, or perhaps something more subtle which can destroy the ozone or warm the planet. 
- Potentially devestating nuclear weapons become more powerful and proliferation is made evermore easy with communication and transportation advancements. This leads to socially stressful military concepts like mutually assured destruction. The duck and cover drills accompany other lifestyle aspects of an advanced technological society. 
- New forms of entertainment, such as video games and internet access could have possible social effects on areas such as academic performance. 
- Creates new diseases and disorders such as obesity, laziness and a loss of personality. 
-computer virus and bug 
-privacy and stolen copy right 
-make part of people over concentrate on computering, then lost of friendly and face to face communication chance. Bad for eye watching if over look for long time 
-no physical stock, easy buy fake product and cheating by people 
- people will lose their jobs to machines that will do the work for them 
- machines and robots are too complex for most people to us.


Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_disadvantages_of_technology_today#ixzz1wGe8OBxk


I think it is not wrong to use this technologies but we have to put a boundary so that we do not use this technologies for inappropriate things. We can fully utilize the benefits that we can get for our life and thankful that this technologies can help us.

Monday 28 May 2012

New campus life


The starting of new campus life which started on 5 March 2012. The life of a degree student in a new campus which is UiTM Kampus Bandar Melaka. When I first arrived at Melaka, I feel that I need to be a student that can graduate with flying colours which I have to try the hardest but the first semester was quite enjoying because the curiosity to explore new place which made me not so serious. Hei...I promise that it will be the last. Next we move on to the place that I stay which is Kolej Tun mamat. Here are some pictures.





The place is comfortable and big but there just a slight of problem which is hot during night so some of my house mate including me sleep at the living room. It takes about 5 to 10 minutes by walking to my campus. My house mate are fun and sometime could be annoying.Hahaha... My house mate are Maui Ng, Nazir, Faiz, Latiff, Ajim, Fad and ucop which he is my room mate. Now, let's move on to my class mates. There 19 people in the class included me. They all are fun, crazy sometime but most of all we are enjoying each other company so friends let's no fight between us. Hehe... 

ME ME AND ME

Before we start doing something, we should start with bismillah. So here I go  بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. First of all, this is the first time I create a blog, my own peronal blog. It feels quite exciting because I am doing something new. Inspired by creating a new blog I give the title of this blog the life that should be because in life we should try something new or getting out our comfort zone so that we can know the meaning of life itself. Owh... I forgot to introduce myself. My name that been given to me by my parents is Mohamad Shadeeq Bin Sharun. I born at Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah, Klang which the date was 18 April 1992. I am just an ordinary person that will do extraordinary things. As the picture below shows that from the left is my father Sharun Supian, next that will be me, my older brother Mohamad Shahreel Bin Sharun, my mom Sharifah Norizan Bt Syed Ahmad, my sister Siti Shaheera Bt Sharun and lastly my younger brother Mohamad Shaheen Bin Sharun.


HOLIDAY
 I studied a SK (2) Simpang Lima, Klang from the year 1999 to 2004 then I continued my secondary at SMK Shahbandaraya from the year 2005 to 2009. Then, I continued doing my diploma at Uitm Kuala Terengganu in Business Studies for three semester because I got the offer for doing fast track which means I jump to doing degree in International Business. I like to play futsal just like other boys. When I play, the feel of excitement when our team playing is something that cannot be describe into words. I also like to do others outdoor activities such as badminton, bowling and many more. So here a video of football that inspired me. Enjoy...